Say it without quite saying it and then pretend to be outraged when people notice. Michelle Michelle Goldberg of The New York Times has noticed:
In a sketch on the German comedy show âBrowser Ballett,â a man in a Nazi uniform, replete with jackboots and a red swastika armband, is marching down a street in 1933 when another man hisses, âNazi.â The Nazi, aghast at the insult, confronts him.
âWhen youâre running out of arguments itâs easy to play the Nazi card,â says the Nazi. He continues, âJust because someone doesnât share the mainstream opinion he isnât automatically a Nazi.â Flustered, the other man replies: âBut being a Nazi is already mainstream. You National Socialists already have the power.â To which the Nazi, with a condescending grin, says: âOh, I forgot. In your world everyone is a Nazi.â
Itâs a perfect satire of how the modern right operates. The right-winger starts with a bigoted provocation and, when criticized, defaults to aggrieved claims of persecution and accusations of oversensitivity. He revels in the power heâs amassed even as he poses as a victim. This dynamic has been particularly stark since the musician Kanye West, who now goes by Ye, declared his intention to go âdeath con 3 on JEWISH PEOPLE.â
Usually, mainstream conservatives are a bit more nuanced in their antisemitism. They decry the Luciferian puppet master George Soros, or, as Dxxxx Txxxx did in a 2016 campaign ad featuring images of prominent Jews in finance, refer to âthose who control the levers of powerâ and âglobal special interests.â Marjorie Taylor Greene attributed the 2018 California wildfires to space lasers controlled, in part, by the Rothschild banking family. Doug Mastriano, the Republican candidate for Pennsylvania governor â and not, in general, an opponent of religious education â has recently attacked his Democratic opponent, Josh Shapiro, for sending his kids to an âexclusive, eliteâ Jewish day school, saying it shows âdisdain for people like us.â
Such insinuating rhetoric lets Republicans speak to antisemites and then take umbrage when other people notice. The umbrage itself then becomes part of the political message: Those people wonât let you say anything anymore! Usually, this performance depends on language with at least a shred of ambiguity, allowing the speaker to adopt a posture of put-upon faux naĂŻvetĂ©. âApparently now itâs some kind of racist thing if I talk about the school,â huffed Mastriano.
Ye, however, doesnât bother with ambiguity. Last week, after Sean Combs, the rapper known as Diddy, criticized him for his âWhite Lives Matterâ T-shirts, Ye posted an exchange on Instagram accusing Combs of being controlled by Jews. That got Yeâs Instagram account frozen, so he went on Twitter, where he was welcomed back by the siteâs likely future owner, Elon Musk. There, after announcing his vendetta against the Jewish people, Ye addressed us directly: âYou guys have toyed with me and tried to blackball anyone whoever opposes your agenda.â
If Republicans were capable of shame they might have felt some. Ye, who long ago embraced Dxxxx Txxxx, had just given an interview to Tucker Carlson in which he lambasted the mediaâs âgodless agendaâ and railed against abortion. Always thirsty for celebrity validation, conservatives ate the interview up. The account for the Republicans on the House Judiciary Committee tweeted, âKanye. Elon. Trump.â And now here was Ye showing, in a completely unvarnished way, just what his right-wing conversion entails. (As it turns out, Carlson already knew; Vice has since revealed that Yeâs most paranoid and unhinged comments were edited out.)
Itâs not surprising that few conservatives are rushing to distance themselves from Ye, committed as they are to defending their right to malign their enemies without consequence. Antisemites, after all, may be the original trolls. As Jean-Paul Sartre wrote in âAnti-Semite and Jew,â first published in English in 1948, antisemites âknow that their remarks are frivolous, open to challenge. But they are amusing themselves, for it is their adversary who is obliged to use words responsibly, since he believes in words.â It was antisemites who perfected the pose of just asking questions; the Holocaust denier David Irving famously demanded that Deborah Lipstadt, a scholar of the Holocaust, debate him.
Criticizing Ye requires acknowledging that thereâs such a thing as going too far, and values higher than owning the libs. A few conservatives made the pivot; the hosts of âFox & Friends Weekend,â whoâd earlier condemned Yeâs Instagram suspension, called his tweets âuglyâ and âunfortunate.â Others, however, stuck to the typical right-wing script.
On Twitter, Todd Rokita, the Indiana attorney general last in the news for attacking a doctor who performed an abortion on a 10-year-old rape victim, accused the media of targeting Ye for his âindependent thinkingâ and for âhaving opposing thoughts from the norm of Hollywood”. The right-wing media figure Candace Owens â whoâd worn a White Lives Matter shirt alongside Ye â [acted] outraged that anyone would interpret a man promising to wage his own personal war on the Jewish people as antisemitic.
âFirst and foremost, what is âdeath con three?ââ she asked…. She added, indignant, âItâs like you cannot even say the word âJewishâ without people getting upset.â
The absurdism here is darkly funny, but it shouldnât distract us from the serious thing thatâs happening. Whatâs striking about Yeâs naked antisemitism isnât that he crossed a line but that, for some of his powerful allies, he didnât….On Monday night, Owens was on Carlsonâs show â one of the most-watched cable news shows in the country â praising Ye for standing up for oppressed white people. His tweets about Jews didnât come up.