Terrorists announce attack on Washington. Federal police agencies allow it to happen.

This was published in The Washington Post yesterday:

Talk of guns and potential violence is rife on the encrypted messaging app Telegram, the conservative social media site Parler and on thedonald.win, an online forum that previously operated on Reddit before the company banned it in June after years of racism, misogyny, anti-Semitism and calls for violence.

Trumpโ€™s tweet last month pushing baseless fraud claims and promoting the โ€œbig protestโ€ on Jan. 6 โ€” โ€œBe there, will be wild!โ€ โ€” has become a central rallying cry. It was the top post on thedonald.win Tuesday morning, and anonymous commenters saw it as a call to action: โ€œWeโ€™ve got marching orders,โ€ the top reply said.

Discussion in the thread followed about how most effectively to sneak guns into Washington, laced with occasional references to using them. . . .

Of carrying guns in D.C., one poster in the thread wrote, โ€œYes, itโ€™s illegal, but this is war and weโ€™re clearly in a post-legal phase of our society.โ€ Wrote another: โ€œLIVE AS A FREE AMERICAN AND BRING YOUR ARMS!โ€

Unquote.

Here are some of the federal police agencies that could have protected the Capitol building today, but weren’t around:

UntitledUntitled2

But if youโ€™re a White male terrorist from the radical right, possibly heavily-armed, you have privileges the rest of us donโ€™t. Much of Trumpโ€™s administration is on their side. So are many police officers. The U.S. Capitol Police failed miserably. They apparently didnโ€™t ask for assistance from other agencies, even though the likelihood of an attack was public knowledge.ย 

In striking contrast, scenes at peaceful Black Lives Matter protests in Washington this year:

images

200601_dcprotest_turner_24

5ed9175dbdc79.image

ErE8IpbWMAIkGcV