A statistic from Vox: More Americans have been killed with guns since 1968 than have died in all of our wars going back to 1776.
Now, we all know that the purpose of “automatic” weapons is to disable or kill many people very quickly. Rational Americans understand that no private citizen should legally possess powerful weapons of this kind or the ammunition that goes with them. The Constitution doesn’t give us the right to bear any kind of “arms” no matter how dangerous. Making these weapons illegal does not require going down the slippery slope to banning all firearms. The United States isn’t going to invade Texas and even Texas isn’t the Wild West. More guns and more powerful guns means more innocent people being maimed and killed.
But if law-abiding citizens don’t own such weapons, only criminals will! That’s exactly right. Police and the armed forces will have access to these weapons in case they’re needed. Anybody else who has an automatic weapon will be and should be a criminal.
From New York Times op-ed writer Timothy Egan’s article about our latest massacre:
A day after the California carnage, the Senate decided to do nothing, again, voting down a measure that would have made it more difficult for people on the terror watch list, felons and the mentally ill to buy guns.
Well, it wasn’t as if the whole Senate made that decision:
|YEAs (Do Something) — 45|
|NAYs (Do Nothing) — 54|
So, I have two recommendations. The first is for Democrats (D) and Independents (I):
Support rational gun control, do what you can to make your position known and always vote, but never, ever vote for a Republican.
The second is for Republicans (R):
Seek treatment from a qualified mental health professional.
Times columnist Gail Collins describes some of the rationalizations offered by Republican politicians in support of doing nothing.