Monthly Archives: December 2012

That Amendment Again

Posted on by

“A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.”

Fortunately, a well-regulated militia is no longer necessary to the security of a free state. It’s not 1789 anymore. We now have the largest “defense” establishment in the world, as well as the FBI, CIA, NSA, ATF, Border Patrol, National Guard, state police, local police, security guards and mercenaries keeping us secure. We devote more energy and resources to security than any other country in the world.

But we’re stuck with the Second Amendment for now. The question is: how should that amendment be interpreted?

In practice, some people interpret it this way: “the right of just about anyone to own and operate the latest in high-tech firearms shall not be infringed”. That’s an extremely liberal interpretation.

After all, none of the rights mentioned in the Declaration of Independence or the Constitution are absolute.  We certainly don’t have an absolute right to life (you can be executed for certain crimes, especially in Texas), liberty (you can be locked up for lots of reasons) and the pursuit of happiness (ditto). You can’t say whatever you want or assemble wherever you want or even practice your religion however you want.

Living with other people means having our rights restricted. In line with that fact of life, we should all start interpreting the Second Amendment in a reasonably restricted way:

“The right of the people to own and operate firearms shall not be infringed, but shall be subject to appropriate regulation, consistent with everyone’s more important rights to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness”.

Even Justice Scalia agrees that the right to bear arms is restricted. The next problem, however, is that he and his like-minded colleagues won’t accept regulation that sufficiently protects other people’s rights to avoid death or injury at the hands of someone with a gun.

After Newtown

Posted on by

The first entry on this blog was written in response to the massacre in Aurora, Colorado, less than 5 months ago:

https://whereofonecanspeak.com/2012/07/24/insanity/

Tom Tomorrow offers a “generic cartoon” on the theory that nothing will change:

http://www.dailykos.com/story/2012/12/17/1169578/-Generic-cartoon

But maybe the horror of what happened in Newtown will finally make a difference. The NRA is trying to pretend that nothing happened last week. Certain politicians are reconsidering their positions. Maybe we can decide as a nation that some of us shouldn’t be allowed to exercise the right to bear arms, and none of us should be allowed to exercise that right by owning weapons designed to kill as many people as possible as quickly as possible.

Nicholas Kristof calls attention to some sensible ways in which we can make this a more civilized country. For example, we could regulate guns as seriously as we regulate cars and ladders:

http://www.nytimes.com/2012/12/16/opinion/sunday/kristof-do-we-have-the-courage-to-stop-this.html

The Forgotten Millions

Posted on by

I’ve been intending to write something here about how America has become a low-wage nation compared to other developed countries. In the meantime, here’s a link to the latest column from the fairly indispensable Paul Krugman, in which he points out that unemployment is still a terrible problem and briefly explains what will happen if we start down the “fiscal slope” (it’s not really a cliff, since its effects will be gradual):

“The unemployment crisis goes on and on, even though we have both the knowledge and the means to solve it. It’s a vast tragedy — and it’s also an outrage.”

Throw in the issues of underemployment and low wages and the problem is even worse.

http://www.nytimes.com/2012/12/07/opinion/krugman-the-forgotten-millions.html?hp